Comfortable ophthalmic device and methods of its production

ABSTRACT

This invention relates to comfortable ophthalmic devices and methods of producing such devices by treating unhydrated, polymerized ophthalmic lens with a polymeric wetting agent, wherein the ophthalmic lens formulation does not comprise said wetting agent prior to its polymerization.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 15/175,526, filed Jun. 7, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,267,952, issued Apr. 23, 2019, which is a divisional of U.S. Ser. No. 14/196,006, filed Mar. 4, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,395,559, issued Jul. 19, 2016, which is a divisional of U.S. Ser. No. 12/896,930, filed Oct. 4, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,696,115, issued Apr. 15, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 11/351,907, filed Feb. 10, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,841,716 issued Nov. 30, 2010, which is a non-provisional filing of two provisional applications, U.S. Ser. No. 60/652,809, filed on Feb. 14, 2005 and U.S. Ser. No. 60/695,783 filed on Jun. 30, 2005.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to comfortable ophthalmic devices and methods of producing such devices.

BACKGROUND

Contact lenses have been used commercially to improve vision since the 1950s. The first contact lenses were made of hard materials. Although these lenses are currently used, they are not suitable for all patients due to their poor initial comfort. Later developments in the field gave rise to soft contact lenses, based upon hydrogels, which are extremely popular today. These lenses have higher oxygen permeabilities and such are often more comfortable to wear than contact lenses made of hard materials. However, these new lenses are not without problems.

Contact lenses can be worn by many users for 8 hours to several days in a row without any adverse reactions such as redness, soreness, mucin buildup and symptoms of contact lens related dry eye. However, some users begin to develop these symptoms after only a few hours of use. Many of those contact lens wearers use rewetting solutions to alleviate discomfort associated with these adverse reactions with some success. However the use of these solutions require that users carry extra solutions and this can be inconvenient. For these users a more comfortable contact lens that does not require the use of rewetting solutions would be useful. Therefore there is a need for such contact lenses and methods of making such contact lenses. It is this need that is met by the following invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 Plot of the change in diameter of treated lenses versus control.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

This invention includes a method of producing ophthalmic lenses comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of, treating a polymerized ophthalmic lens with a wetting agent, provided that the ophthalmic lens formulation does not comprise said wetting agent prior to its polymerization.

As used herein, “ophthalmic lens” refers to a device that resides in or on the eye. These devices can provide optical correction or may be cosmetic. Ophthalmic lenses include but are not limited to soft contact lenses, intraocular lenses, overlay lenses, ocular inserts, and optical inserts. The preferred lenses of the invention are soft contact lenses made from silicone elastomers or hydrogels, which include but are not limited to silicone hydrogels, and fluorohydrogels. Soft contact lens formulations are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,710,302, WO 9421698, EP 406161, JP 2000016905, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,998,498, 6,087,415, 5,760,100, 5,776,999, 5,789,461, 5,849,811, and 5,965,631. The foregoing references are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. The particularly preferred ophthalmic lenses of the inventions are known by the United States Approved Names of acofilcon A, alofilcon A, alphafilcon A, amifilcon A, astifilcon A, atalafilcon A, balafilcon A, bisfilcon A, bufilcon A, comfilcon, crofilcon A, cyclofilcon A, darfilcon A, deltafilcon A, deltafilcon B, dimefilcon A, drooxifilcon A, epsifilcon A, esterifilcon A, etafilcon A, focofilcon A, genfilcon A, govafilcon A, hefilcon A, hefilcon B, hefilcon D, hilafilcon A, hilafilcon B, hioxifilcon B, hioxifilcon C, hixoifilcon A, hydrofilcon A, lenefilcon A, licryfilcon A, licryfilcon B, lidofilcon A, lidofilcon B, lotrafilcon A, lotrafilcon B, mafilcon A, mesifilcon A, methafilcon B, mipafilcon A, nelfilcon A, netrafilcon A, ocufilcon A, ocufilcon B, ocufilcon C, ocufilcon D, ocufilcon E, ofilcon A, omafilcon A, oxyfilcon A, pentafilcon A, perfilcon A, pevafilcon A, phemfilcon A, polymacon, silafilcon A, siloxyfilcon A, tefilcon A, tetrafilcon A, trifilcon A, and xylofilcon A. More particularly preferred ophthalmic lenses of the invention are genfilcon A, lenefilcon A, comfilcon, lotrafilcon A, lotraifilcon B, and balafilcon A. The most preferred lenses include etafilcon A, nelfilcon A, hilafilcon, and polymacon.

The term “formulation” refers to the un-polymerized mixture of components used to prepare ophthalmic lenses. These components include but are not limited to monomers, pre-polymers, diluents, catalysts, initiators tints, UV blockers, antibacterial agents, polymerization inhibitors, and the like. These formulations can be polymerized, by thermal, chemical, and light initiated curing techniques described in the foregoing references as well as other references in the ophthalmic lens field. As used herein, the terms “polymerized” or “polymerization” refers to these processes. The preferred methods of polymerization are the light initiated techniques disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,822,016 which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

As used herein the term “treating” refers to physical methods of contacting the wetting agents and the ophthalmic lens. These methods exclude placing a drop of a solution containing wetting agent into the eye of an ophthalmic lens wearer or placing a drop of such a solution onto an ophthalmic lens prior to insertion of that lens into the eye of a user. Preferably treating refers to physical methods of contacting the wetting agents with the ophthalmic lenses prior to selling or otherwise delivering the ophthalmic lenses to a patient. The ophthalmic lenses may be treated with the wetting agent anytime after they are polymerized. It is preferred that the polymerized ophthalmic lenses be treated with wetting agents at temperature of greater than about 50° C. For example in some processes to manufacture contact lenses, an un-polymerized, or partially polymerized formulation is placed between two mold halves, spincasted, or static casted and polymerized. See, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,495,313; 4,680,336; 4,889,664, 3,408.429; 3,660,545; 4,113,224; and 4,197,266, all of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety. In the case of hydrogels, the ophthalmic lens formulation is a hardened disc that is subjected to a number of different processing steps including treating the polymerized ophthalmic lens with liquids (such as water, inorganic salts, or organic solutions) to swell, or otherwise equilibrate this polymerized ophthalmic lens prior to enclosing the polymerized ophthalmic lens in its final packaging. Polymerized ophthalmic lenses that have not been swelled or otherwise equilibrated are known as un-hydrated polymerized ophthalmic lenses. The addition of the wetting agent to any of the liquids of this “swelling or “equilibrating” step at room temperature or below is considered “treating” the lenses with wetting agents as contemplated by this invention. In addition, the polymerized un-hydrated ophthalmic lenses may be heated above room temperature with the wetting agent during swelling or equilibrating steps. The preferred temperature range is from about 50° C. for about 15 minutes to about sterilization conditions as described below, more preferably from about 50° C. to about 85° C. for about 5 minutes.

Yet another method of treating is physically contacting polymerized ophthalmic lens (either hydrated or un-hydrated) with a wetting agent at between about room temperature and about 85° C. for about 1 minute to about 72 hours, preferably about 24 to about 72 hours, followed by physically contacting the polymerized ophthalmic lens with a wetting agent at between about 85° C. and 150° C. for about 15 minutes to about one hour.

Many ophthalmic lenses are packaged in individual blister packages, and sealed prior to dispensing the lenses to users. As used herein, these polymerized lenses are referred to as “hydrated polymerized ophthalmic lenses”. Examples of blister packages and sterilization techniques are disclosed in the following references which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety, U.S. Pat. Nos. D435,966 S; 4,691,820; 5,467,868; 5,704,468; 5,823,327; 6,050,398, 5,696,686; 6,018,931; 5,577,367; and 5,488,815. This portion of the manufacturing process presents another method of treating the ophthalmic lenses with wetting agents, namely adding wetting agents to packaging solution prior to sealing the package, and subsequently sterilizing the package. This is the preferred method of treating ophthalmic lenses with wetting agents.

Sterilization can take place at different temperatures and periods of time. The preferred sterilization conditions range from about 100° C. for about 8 hours to about 150° C. for about 0.5 minute. More preferred sterilization conditions range from about 115° C. for about 2.5 hours to about 130° C. for about 5.0 minutes. The most preferred sterilization conditions are about 124° C. for about 30 minutes.

The “packaging solutions” that are used in methods of this invention may be water-based solutions. Typical packaging solutions include, without limitation, saline solutions, other buffered solutions, and deionized water. The preferred aqueous solution is deioinized water or saline solution containing salts including, without limitation, sodium chloride, sodium borate, sodium phosphate, sodium hydrogenphosphate, sodium dihydrogenphosphate, or the corresponding potassium salts of the same. These ingredients are generally combined to form buffered solutions that include an acid and its conjugate base, so that addition of acids and bases cause only a relatively small change in pH. The buffered solutions may additionally include 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES), sodium hydroxide, 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)-2,2′,2″-nitrilotriethanol, n-tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid, citric acid, sodium citrate, sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, acetic acid, sodium acetate, ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid and the like and combinations thereof. Preferably, the packaging solution is a borate buffered or phosphate buffered saline solution or deionized water. The particularly preferred packaging solution contains about 1,850 ppm to about 18,500 ppm sodium borate, most particularly preferred about 3,700 ppm of sodium borate.

As used here, the term “wetting agent” refers polymers having a number average molecular weight of about at least 500, that impart a moist feeling when added to the eyes of contact lens wearers. Examples of preferred wetting agents include but are not limited to poly(meth)acrylamides [i.e.poly N,N-dimethylacrylamide), poly (N-methylacrylamide) poly (acrylamide), poly(N-2-hydroxyethylmethacrylamide), and poly(glucosamineacrylamide)], poly(itaconic acid), hyaluronic acid, xanthan gum, gum Arabic (acacia), starch, polymers of hydroxylalkyl(meth)acrylates [i.e. poly(2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate), poly(2,3-dihydroxypropylmethacrylate, and poly(2-hydroxyethylacrylate)], and polyvinylpyrrolidone.

Additional preferred wetting agents include but are not limited to co-polymers and graft co-polymers of the aforementioned preferred wetting agents, such co-polymers and graft co-polymers include repeating units of hydrophilic or hydrophobic monomers, preferably in amounts of about less than ten percent by weight, more preferably less than about two percent. Such repeating units of hydrophilic or hydrophobic monomers include but are not limited to alkenes, styrenes, cyclic N-vinyl amides, acrylamides, hydroxyalkyl (meth) acrylates, alkyl (meth) acrylates, siloxane substituted acrylates, and siloxane substituted methacrylates. Specific examples of hydrophilic or hydrophobic monomers which may be used to form the above co-polymers and graft co-polymers include but are not limited to ethylene, styrene, N-vinylpyrrolidone, N,N-dimethylacrylamide, 2-hydroxyethylmethyacrylate, methyl methacrylate and butyl methacrylate, methacryloxypropyl tristrimethylsiloxysilane and the like. The preferred repeating units of hydrophilic or hydrophobic monomers are N-vinylpyrrolidone, N,N-dimethylacrylamide, 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate, methyl methacrylate, and mixtures thereof. Further examples of wetting agents include but are not limited to polymers with carbon backbones and pendant polyethylene glycol chains [i.e. polymers of polyethylene glycol monoomethacrylate] copolymers of ethylene glycol [copolymers with 1,2,propyleneglycol, 1,3-propylene glycol, methyleneglycol, and tetramethylene glycol]. The preferred wetting agents are polyvinylpyrrolidone, graft co-polymers and co-polymers of polyvinylpyrrolidone, the particularly preferred wetting agent is polyvinylpyrrolidone. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (“PVP”) is the polymerization product of N-vinylpyrrolidone. PVP is available in a variety of molecular weights from about 500 to about 6,000,000 Daltons. These molecular weights can be expressed in term of K-values, based on kinematic viscosity measurements as described in Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, John Wiley & Sons Inc, and will be expressed in these numbers throughout this application. The use of PVP having the following K-values from about K-30 to about K-120 is contemplated by this invention. The more preferred K-values are about K-60 to about K-100, most preferably about K-80 to about K-100. For the treatment of etafilcon A lenses, the particularly preferred K-value of PVP is about K-80 to about K-95, more preferably about K-85 to about K-95, most preferably about K-90.

The wetting agents can be added to the packaging solution at a variety of different concentrations such as about 100 ppm to about 150,000 ppm. For example if the wetting agents are added to packaging solutions containing un-hydrated polymerized ophthalmic lenses, the wetting agents are preferably present at a concentration of about 30,000 ppm to about 150,000 ppm. If the wetting agents are added to packaging solutions containing hydrated polymerized ophthalmic lenses, the wetting agents are preferably present at a concentration of about 100 ppm, to about 3000 ppm, more preferably about 200 ppm to about 1000 ppm, most preferably less than about 500 ppm. For example when etafilcon A lenses are used in this invention and the wetting agent is K-90 PVP, the preferred packaging solution concentration of PVP K-90 is about 250 ppm to about 2,500 ppm, more preferably about 300 to about 500 ppm, most preferably about 350 to about 440 ppm.

When etafilcon A contact lenses are heated with K-90 PVP at a temperature greater than about 120° C. for about 30 minutes at a concentration of about 400 to about 500 ppm, the treated lenses are more comfortable to users than untreated lenses. Further, this particular molecular weight and concentration of PVP does not distort or shift the diameter of the lenses during the treatment cycle or distort the users vision. While not wishing to be bound by any particular mechanism of incorporation, it is known that K-90 PVP is incorporated into the matrix of the lens after it is treated with K-90 PVP. In an etafilcon A contact lens, the preferred amount of incorporated K-90 PVP is about 0.01 mg to about 1.0 mg, more preferred about 0.10 mg to about 0.30 mg, most particularly preferred about 0.10 mg to about 0.20 mg. Lenses that have been treated in this manner are worn by users for up to 12 hours still maintain the incorporated PVP.

Further the invention includes an ocular device comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of a polymerized ophthalmic lens wherein said polymerized ophthalmic lens is treated with a wetting agent, provided that the ophthalmic lens formulation does not comprise said wetting agent prior to its polymerization. The terms “ophthalmic lens,” “wetting agent,” “polymerized,” and “formulation” all have their aforementioned meanings and preferred ranges. The term “treated” has the equivalent meaning and preferred ranges as the term treating.

Still further the invention includes an ocular device prepared by treating a polymerized ophthalmic lens with a wetting agent, provided that the ophthalmic lens formulation does not comprise said wetting agent prior to its polymerization. The terms “ophthalmic lens,” “wetting agent,” “polymerized,” “treated” and “formulation” all have their aforementioned meanings and preferred ranges.

The application of the invention is described in further detail by use of the following examples. These examples are not meant to limit the invention, only to illustrate its use. Other modifications that are considered to be within the scope of the invention, and will be apparent to those of the appropriate skill level in view of the foregoing text and following examples.

EXAMPLES Example 1

Cured etafilcon A contact lenses (sold as 1-Day Acuvue® brand contact lenses by Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.) were equilibrated in deionized water, and packaged in solutions containing PVP in borate buffered saline solution ((1000 mL, sodium chloride 3.55 g, sodium borate 1.85 g, boric acid 9.26 g, and ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid 0.1 g: 5 rinses over 24 hours, 950±μL), sealed with a foil lid stock, and sterilized (121° C., 30 minutes). Before the addition of PVP each solution contained water, 1000 mL, sodium chloride 3.55 g, sodium borate 1.85 g, boric acid, 9.26 g, and ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid 0.1 g. A variety of different weights and concentrations of PVP were used as shown in Table 1, below

The amount of PVP that is incorporated into each lens is determined by removing the lenses from the packaging solution and extracting them with a mixture 1:1 mixture of N,N-dimethylforamide, (DMF) and deionized water (Dl). The extracts are evaluated by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Three lenses were used for each evaluation. The results and their standard deviation are presented in Table 1.

TABLE 1 mg of PVP Sample # Type of PVP Conc. (ppm) in lens Control None None none 1 K-12 3000 0.24 (0.01) 2 K-12 20,000 1.02 (0.01) 3 K-30 1500 1.39 (0.05) 4 K-30 2000 1.50 (0.01) 5 K-60 1000 0.56 (0.00) 6 K-60 1500 0.85 (0.02) 7 K-60 2500 1.02 (0.03) 8 K-90 250 0.10 (0.00) 9 K-90 500 0.14 (0.00) 10 K-90 1000 0.2 (0.01) 11 K-90 2500 0.25 (0.02) 12 K-120 500 0.07 (0.00)

Example 2

Samples of treated etafilcon A lenses were prepared via the treatment and sterilization methods of Example 1 from K-12, K-30, K-60, K-90, and K-120 PVP at concentrations of 0.30%, 1.65%, and 3.00%. After sterilization, the diameter of the lenses was, compared to an untreated lens and evaluated to determine if the process changed those diameters. The results, FIG. 1, plot the change in diameter vs the type of PVP at a particular concentration. This data shows that K-12, K-90, and K-120 have a minimal effect on the diameter of the lenses.

Example 3

Several etafilcon A lenses were treated with K-90 PVP at a concentration of 500 ppm and sterilized according to the methods of Example 1. The lenses were stored in their packages for approximately 28 days at room temperature and were then measured for diameter, base curve, sphere power, and center thickness. Thereafter, lenses were heated at 55° C. for one month. The diameter, base curve, sphere power, and center thickness of the lenses was measured and the results were evaluated against an untreated lens and data is presented in Table 2. This data illustrates that the parameters of lenses treated with K-90 PVP are not significantly affected by time at elevated temperature.

TABLE 2 Change from Baseline of Sample after one month storage at Baseline 55° C. Diameter (mm) 14.37 (0.02)  0.02 Base curve (mm) 8.90 (0.03) −0.01 Power (diopter) −0.75 (0.05)  0.00 Center Thickness (mm) 0.127 (0.005) 0.002

Example 4

Etafilcon-A lenses treated with PVP K-90 at a concentration of 440 ppm and sterilized (124° C., approximately 18 minutes) were sampled from manufacturing lines and measured for diameter, base curve, sphere power, and center thickness and compared to similar measurements made on untreated 1-Day Acuvue® brand lenses. The data presented in Table 3 illustrates that K-90 PVP does not significantly affect these parameters.

TABLE 3 Treated Untreated Diameter (mm) 14.24 (0.04) 14.18 (0.04) Base curve (mm)  8.94 (0.03)  8.94 (0.04) Sphere Power Deviation −0.01 (0.04) −0.02 (0.04) from Target (diopter) Center Thickness Deviation  0.000 (0.004)  0.002 (0.005) from Target (mm)

Example 5

Etafilcon A lenses were prepared according to Example 1 at the concentrations of Table 1. The treated lenses were clinically evaluated in a double-masked studies of between 9 and 50 patients. The patients wore the lenses in both eyes for 3-4 days with overnight removal and daily replacement, and wore untreated 1-Day Acuvue® brand contact lenses for 3-4 days with overnight removal and daily replacement as a control. Patients were not allowed to use rewetting drops with either type of lens. Patients were asked to rate the lens using a questionnaire. All patients were asked a series of questions relating to overall preference, comfort preference, end of day preference, and dryness. In their answers they were asked to distinguish if they preferred the treated lens, the 1-Day control lens, both lenses or neither lens. The results are shown in Tables 4 and 5. The numbers in the columns represent the percentage of patients that positively responded to each of the four options. The “n” number represents the number of patients for a particular sample type. “DNT” means did not test and n/a means non applicable. The numbers illustrate that lenses treated with K-90 PVP at a concentration of about 500 ppm have good clinical comfort on the eye. The sample #refers to the sample numbers in Table 1.

TABLE 4 Overall Preference, % Comfort Preference, % Sample # n PVP treated 1-Day Both Neither PVP treated 1-Day Both Neither 1 9 67 22 11 0 67 22 11 0 2 37 27 49 22 3 30 46 19 5 3 41 34 49 15 2 27 56 12 5 4 10 30 20 50 0 30 40 30 0 5 41 27 61 10 2 22 49 29 0 6 42 33 33 33 0 33 29 38 0 7 37 51 27 19 3 49 11 38 3 8 41 27 37 32 5 24 34 37 5 9 48 33 27 40 0 33 23 44 0 10 45 18 27 51 4 16 20 58 7

TABLE 5 Dryness Preference % End of Day Preference % Sample # n PVP treated 1-Day Both Neither PVP treated 1-Day Both Neither 1 9 33 33 11 0 56 22 44 0 2 37 24 43 22 8 27 43 27 5 3 41 32 51 17 2 29 49 17 2 4 10 20 40 30 10 20 10 60 10 5 41 20 46 32 2 20 41 37 2 6 31 42 24 38 0 38 35 16 6 7 42 36 19 38 3 41 24 40 0 8 41 27 22 49 7 22 24 41 7 9 48 38 21 46 0 33 19 44 0 10 45 24 20 58 4 18 20 51 4

Example 6

An etafilcon A contact lens was treated with 500 ppm of K-90 PVP using the methods of Example 1. The treated lenses were briefly rinsed with phosphate buffered saline solution and rinsed lenses were placed in the well of a cell culture cluster container (Cellgrow XL) that mimics the dimensions of a human eye. See, Farris R L, Tear Analysis in Contact Lens Wears, Tr. Am. Opth. Soc. Vol. LXXXIII, 1985. Four hundred microliters of phosphate buffered saline solution (KH₂PO₄ 0.20 g/L, KCl 0.20 g/L, NaCl 8.0 g/L, Na₂HPO₄ [anhydrous] 1.15 g/L) was added to each container. The wells were covered and the container was stored in an oven at 35° C.

Three lenses were removed from the oven at various times and analyzed by HPLC to determine whether PVP was released into the phosphate buffered saline solution. The average results are presented in Table 6. The limit of quantification for PVP is 20 ppm. The test did not detect any PVP in the analyzed samples. This data shows that PVP is not released at levels greater than 20 ppm.

TABLE 6 Time PVP Released 30 min. <20 ppm 1 hr. <20 ppm 2 hr. <20 ppm 4 hr. <20 ppm 8 hr. <20 ppm 16 hr. <20 ppm 24 hr <20 ppm 

What is claimed is:
 1. An ocular device comprising a polymerized ophthalmic lens wherein said polymerized ophthalmic lens is heated after polymerization to a temperature of at least about greater than 50° C. to about 150° C. with a packaging solution comprising a polymeric wetting agent selected from poly N,N-dimethylacrylamide, copolymers of poly N,N-dimethylacrylamide, and graft co-polymers of poly N,N-dimethylacrylamide, provided that the ophthalmic lens does not comprise said polymeric wetting agent prior to its polymerization.
 2. The device of claim 1 wherein said device does not distort a user's vision.
 3. The device of claim 1 wherein said wetting agent remains in the ophthalmic lens after about 6 hours to about 24 hours of wear by a user. 